پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی، جلد ۷، شماره ویژه نامه انگلیسی، صفحات ۲۳۷-۲۵۵

عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله

عنوان انگلیسی Free Will in Islamic Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience: Ṭabāṭabāʾī and Gazzaniga in Dialogue
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Free will is still one of the most challenging debates among philosophers and theologians and, even in recent decades, scientists’ particularly cognitive neuroscientists. For Michael Gazzaniga (b.1939), as a cognitive neuro-scientist, free will is nothing but an illusion. For him human’s freedom is, in fact, to have more choices in their actions which occurs in their continuous endeavor in the environment and social interactions. In Islamic philosophy, Ṭabāṭabāʾī (d.1402/1981) as one of the most eminent contemporary repre-sentatives of the Transcendent philosophy founded by Mullā Ṣadrā (d. 1050/ 1640), has specific innovative ideas on this matter. According to him, human’s free will is ontologically creational and innate, and all the actions chosen, preferred and issued by an agent through knowledge and volition are free, even if this choice has been limited by natural or human obstacles. For both of the thinkers, therefore, the division of actions into free and non-free and the problem of free will and determinism, in general, is a conventional issue that is more suitable to the social-ethical realm than to the philosophical one. This paper tries to compare and evaluate the two thinkers’ positions.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله volition,Free will,interpreter of experience,conventional perceptions

نویسندگان مقاله Zahra Rasouli |
دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی

Mohammad Kathem Elmi |
دانشکده الهیات و معارف


نشانی اینترنتی https://mi.khu.ac.ir/article_8542_4ee0932f46276313b51570f46266a608.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات