| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Today, quality of life, as a substitute for material well-being and as response to one-dimensional development and one of the most important indicators of social development, is the main social goal of countries. As far as the nature of the development model in Iran is authoritarian, negative, one-dimensional and has created inequality, it is necessary to examine the quality of life. This article deals with quality of life as an indicator of social development. In the framework of the secondary analysis methodology, after dealing with the methodological challenges and achieving 42 indicators in both objective and subjective categories, the ranking has been done based on the national average. According to the findings: Tehran, Yazd, Semnan, Bushehr, first to fourth rank, Isfahan, Alborz, Mazandaran, Qazvin, Markazi, rank 5 to 9 - Qom, Zanjan, Ilam, Khorasan Razavi, Gilan, South Khorasan, Fars, Khuzestan, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Chaharmahal Bakhtiari, East Azerbaijan and Hamedan are ranked 10 to 21 - Golestan, Ardabil, Kerman, Hormozgan, Kermanshah, Kurdistan, Lorestan, North Khorasan, West Azerbaijan are ranked 22 to 30th and Sistan and Baluchestan is 31th. |